Paul Jubb vs Toby Samuel Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second serve analysis: Samuel has a slight edge over Jubb with 45.95% of points won compared to Jubb's 45.42% in recent matches. Could this tiny advantage tip the scales?
• Return game stats: Samuel outperforms Jubb on second serve returns with 50.25%, as opposed to Jubb's 45.21%. On first serve returns, Samuel has a 30.17% success rate, while Jubb follows closely with 28.18%.
• Managing pressure: Jubb shows better performance under pressure, saving 56.28% of breakpoints, whereas Samuel has saved 50%.
• Overall performance: Samuel's annual win rate stands at 66.67%, surpassing Jubb's 56.36%, suggesting a stronger consistency in matches played.
• Preferred surfaces: Both players excel on Clay; Samuel at 75% and Jubb at 72% win rates. What about their weaker surfaces? Jubb struggles more on Grass (54%), whereas Samuel's less favorable surface is I.hard with 60% wins.
• Event level experience: Samuel thrives in lower-tier tournaments with a 73.33% win rate compared to Jubb’s lower success in higher-tier events at 34.48%.
• Direct H2H: Samuel leads with one victory, winning 2 out of 3 sets against Jubb. Their recent clash on October 19, 2023, concluded with Samuel's triumph.
• Pressure situations: Jubb won the only tiebreak played between them, but Samuel clinched the deciding set when matched before.
• Opponent quality: Jubb faces slightly higher-ranked opponents with an average rank of 374.78 compared to Samuel's 414.56.
• Deciding sets overall: Jubb outclasses Samuel in all-matches deciding sets with 63% wins versus Samuel’s 40%.
• Breakpoint conversion: Jubb has a slight edge in converting breakpoints at 33.89%, as opposed to Samuel's 31.85%.

Editorial Prediction (August 17, 2025, UTC):

In this upcoming tennis match between Samuel and Jubb, Samuel's consistency and overall stronger second serve performance could provide a competitive edge. This is further supported by his superior return game stats, particularly against Jubb in past encounters.

Nevertheless, Jubb's greater ability to handle pressure, as seen in a higher breakpoint save percentage and success in deciding sets, should not be underestimated. Jubb's ability to convert breakpoints with higher efficiency aids his potential comeback strategy.

Given the tight margins and both players having their strengths, Samuel seems slightly more favored given his track record in their direct encounters and better overall match consistency. Therefore, while Jubb will certainly present a challenge, Samuel is the probable victor for this match.